Well, this is my first
article and I want to share idea which is the personal perceptive. Corporate
sector or industry which is the engine of development of any country. Without corporate
sector a society can be exist. But a society without corporate (industry) is
seem to be looking impossible or imperfections. Everyone work in the society.
Most
of norms, habitual made by our societies changed by industry or broken the
rules that made by human society and most of changed is beneficial to human
beings or positive externalities on societies. Which effect is that large
portion of population forcefully think to change norms, or changed thought on
traditional rituals. I.e. in Indian societies a norms was popular female is not
made for work in market. But when corporate sector comes gender inequalities is
decrease very rapidly.
Many female work in market in a form of labor or white collar
jobs. However, corporate societies break down bad norms of societies. On the other hand in beginning or emerging
the corporate sector many habitual or traditional that is good also in society
point of view. Not good at least benefits or accepted by all groups of peoples.
I.E. Families should be union. Local
festivals should be celebrated together. Everyone wants to works in locality
(does not means start own business) but get a job in good corporate. A recent
report I studied that an employed person is more productive in near house
rather than work in far from home.
A well-known
corporate sector whose business expend in all over country. Then a labor
person should be employed their localities based on work and skills should be
matched. So a marginal change can save the union families. There are so many
examples which we can finds. Here my question is that if corporate sector
breaks the bad norms of society but also break the good norms. How we can save
the good norms in societies with nonexistence of caste or making the good norms
into bad. Consistency is also bad for society. Because same pattern of behavior
lead into norms and some groups of people hold this pattern that also leads discrimination
or inequalities. So changes is good phenomena that also beneficial to different
people in dynamic periods. A corporate sector should be ruled in dynamic ways
transitional period. Which affects the behavior of person in some extent that
also leads to make the suitable norms that beneficial to human and individual
also. Or breaks the norms that harmful the both human as well as society.
Here
the gap again arise who leads to whose. A society should also leads corporate
social ethics, norms, responsibility etc. or vice-versa. Should also leads
simultaneously? However there is factors that also helps to make a decision first
change- change the pattern of corporate
sector ethics or responsibilities? sometimes should be tight or sometimes not
its proceed in cyclical trend. , second development of sector in both industry
and society if one sector grow fast than second sector depress automatically at
least good ethics also which is not good for societies or industries both.
Thirds is both simultaneous changes. Government also interfere in this affairs
by making a law or institutional that also see the situations. But making a law
is not always good for democratic countries.
Name
Balbir Singh
